Disclaimer:
This site is operated by Edward Vranic.
Any
articles, tweets, stocktalks or any other form of dissemination in
person or online are all the sole product of my personal opinion. I may
hold positions in securities I mention and reserve the right to open,
close, or modify positions at any time
without notice. The information provided herein is strictly for
informational purposes
only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell, or
as a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. I am not a
registered investment adviser nor I do not hold any licenses.
Individuals are encouraged to consult with their personal financial
adviser for financial advice.
There is no
guarantee that any estimate, forecast or forward looking statement
presented herein will materialize and actual results may vary. Investors
are encouraged to do their own research and due diligence before making
any investment decision with respect to any securities discussed
herein, including, but not limited to, the suitability of any
transaction to their risk tolerance and investment objectives.
You
agree that by reading my material, you are acting at your own risk. In
no event will I be liable for any direct or indirect trading losses
caused by any information contained herein or in other dissemination
methods. I make no representations, and specifically disclaim all
warranties,
express, implied, or statutory, regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or
completeness of any material contained in this site. I do not guarantee
that I am providing all of the information that may
be available on any topic written. I recommend that you do your own due
diligence and consult a registered financial adviser before buying or
selling any security.
Trading in securities involves
risk and volatility. Past results are not necessarily indicative of
future performance. My conclusions are the result of my personal due
diligence and have been wrong in the past and will be wrong again in the
future.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PKK released its Q4 results, building on the improved results we saw in Q3. The company didn't provide an EBITDA chart like it did in its Q3 press release, but I have done my own calculations:
Revenue increased from $710,000 to $742,000 which was in line with my forecast seen in a post last November and below under the "Q4 estimate" section. I expected just a slight lift in revenue from the marginally increased loan capacity of ASFC as cash flows from lending activities from the previous period are reinvested and a tiny bit of revenue from third party lenders on the Cubeler platform who were in a trial period using it.
I was far more impressed by the EBITDA results. An $89,000 EBITDA loss versus my expectation of a $300,000 loss. Based on that kind of trajectory, I'm optimistic that we could see positive EBITDA numbers as soon as Q1 which will be released within six weeks.
Why did I think EBITDA loss was going to go in the wrong direction compared to Q3? PKK is a growth company that has done and will need to continue to do hiring. Some R&D investments were made as part of the Cubeler trial period for the third party lenders and revenue growth wasn't going to be that much for Q4. So I thought expenses would have increased greater than revenue for Q4. Expenses did increase but mainly in the form of usual year-end type of cleanup that auditors require like the impairment of the intangible asset of $471,000. But those types of expenses are excluded from the EBITDA calculation. Ideally that is the end of these types of write-offs as PKK anticipates relaunching Gold River under the AST subsidiary and therefore will be a revenue-generating entity again and its remaining book value won't be subject to hastened write-offs.
Something else to point out is the decrease in the non-controlling interest profit (the 49% of ASFC's profit that goes to its minority stakeholders) from $144,000 in Q3 to $25,000 in Q4. Based on ASFC's stable operations and margins, I am surprised to see such a variance. I would have expected around $150,000 in net profit going to the minority interest in Q4. One theory I have is that the minority interest took acceptance of costs in excess of $100,000 away from PKK, accounting for the difference in the minority interest profit negative variance and EBITDA positive variance. This is all just my guesswork though. But it doesn't really matter that much. Q4 was meant to be a transitional quarter for most investors. It is Q1 and especially Q2 in 2019 that I am particularly looking forward to seeing.
Based on these results and the Wenyi acquisition in January, I am expecting revenue to be in excess of $1 million in Q1 with EBITDA being in the range of -$50,000 to +$50,000. If PKK can show a quarter being essentially EBITDA breakeven (with the expectation of overall net loss after interest and deprecation), this will be a very positive news story leading into Q2 where things should really get interesting. The good news is after we were waiting for five months between Q3 and the annual report, we are in the golden period where this report, Q1 and Q2 will come in the same amount of time.
No comments :
Post a Comment